Mobile Unlocking Blogspot Is It Fair That We Still Have To Pay For Mobile SIM Unlocking?

Is it fair that we still have to pay for mobile SIM unlocking? - mobile unlocking blogspot

Italian regulator AGCOM states if the operator wants a grant to sell phone, it must publicly express the amount of the grant. Phones can not be blocked longer than 18 months and consumers have the right to lock after 9 months off, the operator to pay half the value of the original grant.

This was introduced last year.

The Belgian government can not SIM-locked phones will be sold. In the Netherlands, the networks can block a phone for 12 months, but then must enter the unlock code free of charge to the customer. Finnish mobile phone are supplied unlocked, and the general limitations are much less common in Scandinavia than in the United Kingdom.

What I first want to determine is that I think that is unfair by the development fee. ContrMobile phones are heavily traded is subsidized by the networks, but after locking in the first period of the contract networks were recovered from their wallets. A fee (currently 15 for my network) to unlock a phone that is mine, and then after completion of the contract is comparable to the sale of my house without the keys.

In the latter, I would say that the residents of the United Kingdom are at a disadvantage compared with persons residing in Finland, Belgium, Netherlands and Italy.

What I want is to advertise here to see how the people what can be more accepted. If that is the United Kingdom, with parliamentarians, with the MEP or the networks themselves? (Or a combination?)

On the back of this, I would be willing to put forward a draft for a letter ... This may seem like the blue sky without the rightw, but why should we pay a processing fee for something that is ours, and that other citizens do not? We changed to require banks, we seem to be the cost of the mortgage change.